massage and bodywork professionals
a community of practitioners
Tags:
Views: 185
Replies are closed for this discussion.
I agree that the article missed the boat on the opportunities available for CE courses available with Gayle MacDonald and Tracy Walton, among many others. But, the authors are from the Cortiva Institute so they are emphasizing their program. While their program is unique, there is much more that can be done to expand the use of massage for people with cancer. To me, one of the mst important steps that needs to be taken is to get the MD's (and insurance co's) on board with the benefit of massage - for general health, and for oncology patients in particular. That has been my main roadblock to building any type of oncology massage business. The MD's were afraid of the liability factor in their offices, as well as concerned about how would it be paid for, which the insurance co's won't cover.
The authors seem to put an emphasis on schools including medical massage within their curriculums. I don't think oncology massage should be taught within the main massage curriculum. There are too many factors to consider for the beginning MT to handle right out of school.
I notice they ask MT's about working within the medical system, and not about oncology massage in particular. Which is the same for the article, even though it is sub-titled "Hands-On Therapy for Onclogy Patients".
Gary Thanks. I am an old school Chicago School of Massage Therapy grad which is now owned by Cortiva. What a disappointment. Those of us with oncology massage training just need to keep raising the bar and educating others.
Gary Lloyd said:I agree that the article missed the boat on the opportunities available for CE courses available with Gayle MacDonald and Tracy Walton, among many others. But, the authors are from the Cortiva Institute so they are emphasizing their program. While their program is unique, there is much more that can be done to expand the use of massage for people with cancer. To me, one of the mst important steps that needs to be taken is to get the MD's (and insurance co's) on board with the benefit of massage - for general health, and for oncology patients in particular. That has been my main roadblock to building any type of oncology massage business. The MD's were afraid of the liability factor in their offices, as well as concerned about how would it be paid for, which the insurance co's won't cover.
The authors seem to put an emphasis on schools including medical massage within their curriculums. I don't think oncology massage should be taught within the main massage curriculum. There are too many factors to consider for the beginning MT to handle right out of school.
I notice they ask MT's about working within the medical system, and not about oncology massage in particular. Which is the same for the article, even though it is sub-titled "Hands-On Therapy for Onclogy Patients".
© 2024 Created by ABMP. Powered by