massage and bodywork professionals

a community of practitioners

Last week, the Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards presented their long-awaited proposal for a new national continuing education approval program. They are calling it Maintenance of Core Competencies – or MOCC for short. As I indicated in my previous post, this proposal not only failed to deliver on the original promises made by FSMTB, it has turned the entire professional landscape on its ear by recommending that most continuing education should be voluntary, not mandatory for license renewal.

Under this “MOCC-ERY” of a plan, the only mandatory components of continuing education would be those FSMTB deems to be relevant to “public safety”. If that’s not bad enough, FSMTB is proposing to take control over the design and delivery of these courses. Except it isn’t continuing education … it’s proving that you still know the things you should have learned in entry-level massage training as it pertains to protection of the public.

As a licensed therapist, do you want to be taken back to subjects like Ethics 101, principles of hygiene and sanitation, and the naming of unsafe massage practices – EVERY TIME YOU HAVE TO RENEW YOUR LICENSE? I’ve been teaching professional ethics for 14 years, and frankly, I find this proposal to be an insult to my intelligence.

I was very gratified today to receive the press release from AMTA denouncing the plan. In part, important communication states:

“AMTA reviewed the proposal and has many concerns with the approach of the FSMTB, the proposal itself, its inconsistencies and the lack of support provided for their view. Some of our specific areas of concern are:

Overall, the impact of this proposal is to lower standards for massage therapy practice. It would shift the focus of professional development from building on the entry level education massage therapists receive to that of maintaining very minimal requirements of public protection.
The proposal contradicts its stated intent, previous FSMTB statements on the need for continuing professional education and the mission of FSMTB.
The proposal would take away the freedom of choice of massage therapists to determine their own practice focus and to choose the continuing education providers they prefer to meet their own professional needs by creating a “one-size-fits-all” approach for license renewal.

The proposal provides no empirical data to support the efficacy, efficiency or necessity for a transition to this model.” READ MORE...

Views: 116

Comment

You need to be a member of massage and bodywork professionals to add comments!

Join massage and bodywork professionals

Comment by Maryshka on October 26, 2012 at 11:20pm

Hi Laura,

I am learning a lot about the politics of my new-found profession... ugh. A big thank to you for presenting it... yay.

With the upcoming changes to massage therapy credentialing, perhaps MT continuing education could be approached in a similar manner as real estate such as that mandatory continuing education for real estate license renewal (18 hours per every 3-year cycle) must include 2 hours of ethics/law per year in addition to other updated information or course of consultant's choosing.

If extra continuing education hours have been acquired, however, they do not carry over into the next qualifying year. I would suggest that any hours over and beyond the requirement in one year be carried over to subsequent years because the knowledge will always benefit practitioner and client alike and the expense incurred.

Your thoughts?

© 2024   Created by ABMP.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service