massage and bodywork professionals
a community of practitioners
this is moved over from the other thread "Body Cells Carry Emotional Memories", where Gordon expressed his beliefs on the anatomy of emotion and trauma.
Gordon, thank you for putting it out there to respond to.
I am going to put some facts out for your consideration, but I don't have any interest in fighting about it.
Accept what I say or reject it, as you wish. But remember, I am responding to your ideas; I am not attacking you for having them.
Body/mind are one.
In one sense, I will agree with you--there is no mystical dualistic "other" dimension involved. Body and mind are material + process + emergent properties (more complex or self-organizing) effects that arise out of interactions among other parts of the system).
But just because they are both part of the same continuum does not mean they are identical, nor that they carry out each other's processes. This is a point on which we apparently differ. When you argue that memories are stored in body cells, then you are conflating different things that the mind and body do interactively.
One example is that fear is stored in the shoulders...Its a neurological reflex.
There is a Buddhist proverb about not mistaking the moon for the finger pointing to it. In your first sentence, it sounds like you are confusing the reaction in the shoulders (the finger pointing to the moon) with the fear (the moon itself). In your second sentence, it sounds like you are clearer that the nervous and muscular reaction is in response to the fear, not that it's the fear itself.
If anyone wants to argue at this point that it's mere semantics, take it up with the Buddhists--they drew this distinction thousands of years ago, because it's an important one.
So immagin a young child that lives in an abusive household...Say the dad is an alchohalic and beats up the mother every weekend that he is drunk...So every time the child sees and hears the abuse his shoulders raise up to his neck ...The child is stuck in this family and every time he sees his dad, his shoulders raise up in fear.he cant escape the situation...That fear is locked into his cells,,his entire body/mind.
That's a conditioned neuromuscular response in reaction to the fear. You can break the connection between the fear and the response, so that he can learn not to react in that way, even though he still may feel the fear. It's the finger pointing to the moon again, the fear being in the brain, not in the epithelial cells or muscle cells where the response is. It's not dualism for parts of a unified whole to carry out different tasks from one another--body and mind are one, but complementary.
.A caved in chest implicates poor self esteem.
Except when it means a genetic disorder, or a traumatic accident, or the sequelae of an infectious or nutritional or metabolic disorder, or something else.
In the 18th and 19th centuries, scientists used to think very simplistically about cause and effect. A causes B, that simple. And there are still a few cases where that kind of thinking is totally appropriate:
Except for a few isolated cases like that, though, to say that some A always causes some B, or that some C is always caused by some D: we just can't do it. The body and the environment are too complex, and some conditions have many different causes. For the cases where it does look like that--HD, rabies--we can draw a picture like this:
http://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.170/old-www/2005-Fall/6170/ps4/graph...
meaning the circle on the left (the gene, the virus) caused the circle on the right (terrible disease).
The kind of overly simplistic thinking that went on in the 1700s and 1800s--I call it the "vending machine model"--led to pseudosciences such as phrenology, where people believed that by feeling bumps on a person's skull, that they could read their psychology or moral character. We have known for a long time that things just aren't as simple as we used to believe, and we can't always put in the same input and guarantee that we will get the same output, as a vending machine does.
This is where systems thinking comes in. Rather than just saying A means B, we take into account the whole network of causes that can result in a whole network of effects. A little change in cause can lead to a big change in effect, or vice-versa--this is where the saying about a butterfly's wings flapping in China comes from. One tiny deletion in a chromosome can mean that a baby dies an agonizing death shortly after birth. Or, the other way around, changes in only 1-2% of our DNA means the difference between a human and a chimp.
This is what a network of interactions at the genetic level looks like:
http://asajj.roswellpark.org/huberman/BIR572/19b.SGAresults.gif
You'll see that there are lots of dots that are quite far apart, and you have to have multiple connections to get from one to the other. So for cause-and-effect chains like that, there are lots of events that have to happen. There are relatively fewer direct connections between dots, like the HD and rabies examples above (100% correlation). Note that the network doesn't represent HD or rabies; I'm just using that one to illustrate a point about how networks work in general.
And because those connections represent interactions, you will begin to see emergent properties from those interactions showing up as well. Those properties act in the network of case and effect, making the picture even more complex than it was originally. This is how modern anatomists think of interactions in the body, both at the molecular and at higher levels.
My recommendation, if massage truly wants to become a healthcare profession, is that we align ourselves with this kind of systems science understanding of anatomy, based on the evidence, and neither oversimply cause and effect, nor confuse the finger and the moon itself.
Thank you for putting your ideas out there for me to react to, Gordon, and I am not attacking you; I am just pushing back against the model you use to explain why I think this one is better for us.
Feel free to take it or leave it as you like; I'm pretty disgusted with the "professional" debate atmosphere here, and I don't plan to get in a fight about it.
Gordon wrote:
Tags:
Views: 89
Gordon I agree on the importance of the talk. I would add attitude even without speech can say a lot. Our work is a balancing act between actual correction through manual manipulation, power of touch and encouraging a confident attitude nourishing well being. I don't mean getting the client to believe in me, but to believe in their ability to be better.
placebo effect
Hi Raven.
At this post you proposed information related to general education related to body /mind medicine. It is absolutely obvious to me that you didn't read carefully my article .
Like I stated in our previous discussion “Body cells carry emotional memory”theory as a name wasn't proposed by me but by one who have practiced physical methods of treatment, and observed cases, when therapist touching particular body part, patient releasing emotions. Name “body cells carry emotional memory” is absolutely correct definition , because no one knows where this negative emotions stored. Our body including brain compost by trillions of cells, and somewhere these emotions are stored, and absolutely obvious to me that massage therapy triggering this extremely important for clients health, negative emotions releases. Just for general information and to avoid future misunderstandings I would like you to know, that I never proposed and posting general information, but only related to the treatment room. More than this, I strongly believe that general education for students in massage programs, as well as a continued education format should be offered as extra curriculum activities. In such a case, therapist’s mind will be focused on most important in our occupation, is to deliver results/ health benefits by means of hands on massage. Now I am worry that the message of my short article was somehow distracted . Not to repeat myself, I would like to invite practitioners who didn't have opportunity to read my:” Body cells carry emotional memory” article where I believe could be found practical for daily use very important information.
"In such a case, therapist’s mind will be focused on most important in our occupation, is to deliver results/ health benefits by means of hands on massage."
Results by hands on massage, that is really what it is all about.
agree with you Gordon.Honestly it isn't possible to get enough satisfactions from clinical outcomes of our work . Simplicity and therapeutic power practically cannot stop to amaze me. This facts constantly stimulating and fueling my passion and love to our occupation.
Best wishes.
Boris
Gordon J. Wallis said:
Yea, hands on... Its amazing what massage can do... I mean it really is... Ive been doing it 26 years..And Im still freaked out about it...
© 2024 Created by ABMP. Powered by