massage and bodywork professionals
a community of practitioners
I had a new client the other day for an 80 minute massage. I asked him if there is anything that he wanted me to know. He told me that he suffers from a herniated disc that he has had for a few years. He has constant low back and right hip pain that at times radiates down the back of his leg to his knee. He told me that he has had two injections in his low back and has to stay on anit- inflamtory medication. Anything to avoid surgery. The pain is always there. I asked him if he ever saw a chiropractor for his pain. He said yes. But the adjustments hurt his hip so bad that he could not continiue. So here is a guy that thinks he is on the verge of surgery. I knew that there was a very strong probubllity that was not the case. The vast majority of pain people experience is nocioceptive pain( soft tissue- muscle, tendon, ligament, facia). MDs and Chiropractors see pain as neuropathic pain( nerve pain). With that asumption they give the wrong treatments and therapies. Now there is no denying that at times injections and surgery is needed. Not denying that. But most of the time - NOT. 70% to 85% of all pain comes directly from trigger points. Anyway I showed my client a testimonial from a client that I was able to help out of a very painful condition that she had delt with for a couple of years. I showed him that testimonial because all pain has a psychological eliment too it. I wanted him to start thinking maybe he is not on the edge of surgery. I palpated his entire back upper torso, both hips, and right leg. I found a very painful spot on his right L5 erectors. Another very painful spot on his right greater trochantor. A painful spot in the middle part of his lower right hamstrings. And also a tender spot on the right spinous of L3. I knew that if Iwas able to eliminate all those painful palaptory spots that I would most likely eliminate his pain problem. Because a healthy body had no painful spots even with deep massage. Ive been hunting and eliminateing trigger points for thirty years now. He walked out of the massage room pain free. He was pain free for the first time in years. All those other professional people misdiagnosed him because they assume neuropathic pain over nocioceptive pain. I assume the other way around. I'm a Massage Therapist.
Tags:
Views: 33691
Stacey, I disagree with you on so many levels, you and I probably won't reach agreement about anything.
Firstly, no one is predicting the outcome of a particular surgery. However, based on her personal knowledge, and experience working with victims of "failed surgeries," Therese made a generalization to her friend Gordon-- to Gordon, not intended for worldwide dissemination. Certainly undeserving of your personal attack.
Scar tissue is a natural reaction, just as you say. Scar tissue can also become restrictive, which you must not have known. So much so that follow up operations sometimes must be performed in order to restore even partial ROM.
Adhesions and trigger points absolutely do exist. Slipped discs don't slide out of alignment due to, say, a sneeze. But they do happen. Impacts in an accident causing severe, sudden wrenching movements can overpower the erectors' ability to maintain spinal stability. The majority begin, however, with one trigger point that results in the development of helper trigger points up and down the spine. That you deny the existence of trigger points reveals a gaping hole in your education and experience. Those who are skilled in locating and eliminating trigger points can accomplish more for their clients in 2 or 3 sessions than MDs with their drugs, PTs with their exercises, and DCs with their adjustment tables can get done in months. Granted, to those who cannot find a trigger point even on themselves even if they flashed neon red when they were touched, trigger point therapy can seem like witchcraft-- especially when it is done as artfully, as painlessly, as quickly as a therapist of Gordon Wallis' caliber.
Stacey L Brown said:
"Can you imagine what surgery would do??? All that scar tissue and fascial adhesions on top of the trigger points.."
I'm interested to know how it is you can predict the outcome or assume an outcome of a surgery that has not yet happened? What are you basing your observations on?
"Scar tissue" is a natural reaction to tissue damage and in-and-of itself is not a pathological situation. It sadly has become one due to many years of manual therapists projecting "scar tissue", "adhesions" and "myofascial TrP" as things to rid the body of.
Which creates quite the ethical conundrum of perpetuating a presumed problem where none exists. But it does keep us relevant and employed as manual therapists and it seems to satisfy patients who don't know any better and who depend on us for help with managing their pain.
Adhesions, trigger points, and slipped discs for that matter, have not been found to exist in the human body, in the way we understand them to be. (Via, MRI scans and postmortem observations)
I've said this ad nauseum before, until we as MT's are willing to be open to new developments in the field of pain science research and open to the idea that we don't know many things about what it is we *think* we are doing, we will not be taken too seriously in the healthcare field.
Therese Schwartz said:As I was reading this I was thinking extensor muscles in the forearm! Can you imagine what surgery would do??? All that scar tissue and fascial adhesions on top of the trigger points...so totally unnecessary!
More good work, Gordon!
Gary, thanks for your comments. I've been round and round with myself about how to address Stacey's comments. I'm still not sure I have a good way, but here's what I have right now.
Stacey, my "assumption" about a surgery that hasn't happened yet is actually an "educated guess" based on personal experience and that of my clients. Of course scar tissue is a natural response to healing and isn't pathological in and of itself. What is pathological is what the scar tissue can do to people - John Barnes says it can pull on surrounding tissues with up to 2,000 psi of force. That's potentially going to cause problems, and it's the problems I'm interested in addressing.
You said: "Scar tissue" is a natural reaction to tissue damage and in-and-of itself is not a pathological situation. It sadly has become one due to many years of manual therapists projecting "scar tissue", "adhesions" and "myofascial TrP" as things to rid the body of.
So, let's take my approach to working with people and your approach to working with people each to their logical conclusions. (If you are interested in what taking things to their logical conclusions looks like in more depth, I suggest reading Orson Scott Card's "Treason"; it's brilliant).
My approach, logical conclusion: more freedom of movement in all tissue systems.
Your approach: don't work on people because what they are experiencing is a natural occurrence.
I'm basing the logical conclusion to your approach on what you have posted here (BTW, the video you posted about pain was awesome and very useful). In general, you have criticized what we are doing and our approaches without offering any information on what we should do instead. I'm open to new ideas; I learn new things all the time. I will throw out entire philosophies and modalities and adopt new ones if they can be shown to work better or make more sense. If you have something better, please share it. We'll all be better off for it.
very well said, Therese.
Therese Schwartz said:
Gary, thanks for your comments. I've been round and round with myself about how to address Stacey's comments. I'm still not sure I have a good way, but here's what I have right now.
Stacey, my "assumption" about a surgery that hasn't happened yet is actually an "educated guess" based on personal experience and that of my clients. Of course scar tissue is a natural response to healing and isn't pathological in and of itself. What is pathological is what the scar tissue can do to people - John Barnes says it can pull on surrounding tissues with up to 2,000 psi of force. That's potentially going to cause problems, and it's the problems I'm interested in addressing.
You said: "Scar tissue" is a natural reaction to tissue damage and in-and-of itself is not a pathological situation. It sadly has become one due to many years of manual therapists projecting "scar tissue", "adhesions" and "myofascial TrP" as things to rid the body of.
So, let's take my approach to working with people and your approach to working with people each to their logical conclusions. (If you are interested in what taking things to their logical conclusions looks like in more depth, I suggest reading Orson Scott Card's "Treason"; it's brilliant).
My approach, logical conclusion: more freedom of movement in all tissue systems.
Your approach: don't work on people because what they are experiencing is a natural occurrence.
I'm basing the logical conclusion to your approach on what you have posted here (BTW, the video you posted about pain was awesome and very useful). In general, you have criticized what we are doing and our approaches without offering any information on what we should do instead. I'm open to new ideas; I learn new things all the time. I will throw out entire philosophies and modalities and adopt new ones if they can be shown to work better or make more sense. If you have something better, please share it. We'll all be better off for it.
Thank you, Gary!
Trigger points is as good a name as any. Not perfect-- for Janet Travell who invented the term was wrong about many other things as well.
The lady that gave me the really good review, I saw her today for a regular massage. She has no more Trigger Points in her body. And coincidently, no more pain in her body either? Hmmm?....I hear some say that Trigger Points arn't real? Well thats why I'm going to call them Painful Palpatory Spots from now on because so far nobody has told me those arn't real. When I first saw her it took me almost an hour to clear out all her Painful Palpatory Spots. I know they were real because she would flinch and vocalize noticeably when I touched them. She had at least 60 of those Painful Palpatory Spots on her body when she first came in. I saw her five times. Her last two sessions were only 15 minutes long because a lot of those Painful Palpatory Spots were no longer there. Now anybody that says those Painful Palpatory Spots aren't real would possibly be suffering from some kind of delusional disorder or something? Not really sure because thats not my expertise. Let's see.... Client comes in with chronic pain, and has 60 Painful Palpatory Spots on her body. After five sessions, client comes in with NO pain in her body and has NO Painful Palpatory Spots on her body. Trigger Points might not be real, but those Painful Palpatory Spots sure are( NO DOUBT WHAT SO EVER ).
I didn't mean for anyone to take my comment as criticism of Janet Travell. A brilliant lady. Hunger for knowledge led her to explore TCM; together with her own personal experience with her own patients, she discovered (rediscovered?) that almost all myofascial pain and dysfunction stems from recognizable, identifiable "painful palpatory spots", which she labeled "trigger points."
Gary W Addis, LMT said:
Trigger points is as good a name as any. Not perfect-- for Janet Travell who invented the term was wrong about many other things as well.
© 2024 Created by ABMP. Powered by